Humor Effect

Category: Memory

The tendency to remember funny material far better than the boring, worthy stuff sitting right next to it.

How it works

When something makes you laugh, your brain treats it as worth more than the neutral material surrounding it. Funny items pull more attention at encoding and get more spontaneous rehearsal, and they pop out against a background of dull sentences the way a red word pops out of a black list. Stephen Schmidt, who ran the definitive experiments in the 1990s, found the effect survives even when you strip out the usual suspects: it holds on free recall and cued recall, for whole sentences and individual words. The catch is that the boost is partly a contrast trick. Humor wins recall largely by being different from its neighbors, which means a page of nothing but jokes is nowhere near as memorable as one joke buried in a wall of tedium.

Where you'll see it

  • Schmidt's core study: participants read mixed lists of humorous and matched non-humorous sentences (same words, rearranged). The funny ones were recalled at markedly higher rates on both free and cued recall, and even the individual words in them were remembered better.
  • You sit through a two-hour compliance training and walk out remembering exactly one thing: the instructor's bit about not microwaving fish in the office kitchen. The actual policy on data handling has evaporated.
  • Ad recall research keeps finding you remember the funny commercial and love the brand, then blank on which product it was actually selling. The joke got encoded, the SKU did not.
  • A professor drops a pun to illustrate a concept. Students nail the pun on the exam and fumble the concept, which fits Carlson's 2011 finding that how funny people rate an item, rather than mere incongruity or elaboration, best predicts how well that item is remembered.

Where it comes from

The effect was pinned down by Stephen R. Schmidt at Middle Tennessee State University. Earlier researchers had noticed people preferred to report funny items, but Schmidt's 1994 paper in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition settled that humorous sentences were genuinely better remembered, not just preferred, by switching to designs that removed the choice. He followed up with humorous cartoons (Schmidt & Williams, 2001) and a 2002 paper in Memory titled "The humour effect: differential processing and privileged retrieval," which argued the boost comes both from how funny material is encoded and from how it gets pulled out at recall. Kieth Carlson's 2011 study in HUMOR later isolated perceived funniness itself, rather than mere incongruity or elaboration, as the best predictor of the memory advantage.

How to counter it

Marry the fact to the joke, don't seat them apart. The humor effect remembers the punchline and drops the point next to it. If a number or rule matters, make it the thing that is funny, so recalling the laugh forces recalling the fact. A safety rule woven into the gag survives; a rule that merely shared the slide with a gag does not.

Kill the contrast when everything matters. The boost is largely a von Restorff style pop-out: one joke in a boring list wins because it is different. If your whole deck is bits, nothing stands out and you have just made a uniformly forgettable, sillier deck. Save humor for the two or three items you most need to land.

Test the boring stuff directly. After any funny lecture, meeting, or ad, quiz yourself on the unfunny content specifically, because that is exactly what your recall is quietly skipping. If you can only reproduce the jokes, you learned the comedian, not the material.

Audit what the humor is selling. When you catch yourself loving a funny ad, pitch, or presenter, stop and ask what the actual claim or product was. Warm feelings toward the joke get misread as agreement with the argument, and you may be remembering charm in place of evidence.

The tell

You can recite the joke perfectly and cannot remember a single thing it was supposed to teach you.

Related biases

References

  1. Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 953-967
  2. Schmidt, S. R., & Williams, A. R. (2001). Memory for humorous cartoons. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 305-311
  3. Schmidt, S. R. (2002). The humour effect: Differential processing and privileged retrieval. Memory, 10(2), 127-138
  4. Carlson, K. A. (2011). The impact of humor on memory: Is the humor effect about humor?. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1), 21-41
  5. Kugler, L., & Kuhbandner, C. (2015). That's not funny! But it should be: effects of humorous emotion regulation on emotional experience and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1296